Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Comedy > Folklore Computers > Intel: an expen...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 306 Topic 4602 of 4733
Post > Topic >>

Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us

by Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 2, 2008 at 06:53 AM

Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080702-intel-an-expensive-many-core-future-is-ahead-of-us.html

from above: 

Intel has bad news for software developers. It's been hinted at already,
but now the company has stated explicitly: it's not enough for software
developers to be targeting dual, quad, or eight cores. No, the future
holds tens, hundreds, or thousands of cores, and developers are going to
have to bite the bullet and write programs that will scale to such
systems.

.... snip ...

recent posts mentioning multiple core chips:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008b.html#3
on-demand computing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008c.html#83
CPU time differences for the
same job
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008d.html#89
Berkeley researcher describes
parallel path
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008e.html#26
Berkeley researcher describes
parallel path
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008e.html#79
Any benefit to programming a
RISC processor by hand?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008f.html#37
Panic in Multicore Land
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008f.html#42
Panic in Multicore Land
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008g.html#6
It's Too Darn Hot
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008g.html#14
Was CMS multi-tasking?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008g.html#61
performance of hardware dynamic
scheduling
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008i.html#100
OS X Finder windows vs terminal
window weirdness
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008j.html#4
What is "timesharing" (Re: OS X
Finder windows vs terminal window  weirdness)
 




 306 Posts in Topic:
Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-07-02 06:53:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
timcaffrey@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-02 19:51:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-07-02 20:06:56 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-07-05 05:33:30 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Chris Barts <chbarts+u  2008-07-06 01:10:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Stupid Shoe <shoe@[EMA  2008-07-25 18:57:04 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-07-25 20:42:12 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
paul hinman <paul.hinm  2008-07-26 21:04:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-07-27 09:50:42 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
mrr@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-07-29 15:47:39 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-07-30 06:33:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-07-31 22:02:31 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-01 06:04:16 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-01 10:41:15 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-01 06:59:27 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-01 13:58:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:08:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 11:50:02 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 08:39:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 14:25:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 06:49:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 11:14:42 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 08:57:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 13:50:14 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:17:28 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 12:08:16 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 10:10:58 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 15:23:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 12:36:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-05 12:03:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 09:16:47 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-05 17:52:01 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:29:33 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-06 19:24:00 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:36:29 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-07 16:07:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-08 06:53:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-08 20:17:58 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-09 09:32:18 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-11 20:43:03 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-06 07:38:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 11:38:41 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 07:49:36 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 21:58:02 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:18:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-05 18:03:45 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:34:42 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-08 11:01:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-08 07:02:13 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-08 20:21:00 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-09 07:16:20 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-09 16:23:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-10 06:20:20 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-04 11:12:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:33:13 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-03 03:40:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 07:04:10 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 11:25:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 11:42:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 09:03:14 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 13:53:30 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 18:53:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:27:20 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:20:07 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-04 09:40:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-04 19:39:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 07:00:40 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-05 09:04:59 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 06:59:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 19:14:56 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 08:58:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 13:55:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:21:36 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-04 11:55:39 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 08:05:38 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 12:22:45 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 09:50:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 15:44:31 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-04 09:27:40 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 16:41:07 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-04 11:11:03 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 19:33:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 06:52:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-05 09:00:56 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-05 11:35:38 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-05 12:27:45 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-05 19:29:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 19:31:39 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-04 19:26:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-05 18:52:25 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-05 19:12:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 12:56:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-05 11:47:37 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 09:12:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-05 09:08:07 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 06:50:41 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
timcaffrey@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-08-12 14:41:40 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-12 15:05:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyck  2008-08-16 03:03:08 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2008-08-12 10:59:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 10:29:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 07:14:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 21:42:38 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Kim Enkovaara <kim.enk  2008-08-06 08:28:00 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:07:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-06 20:36:04 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Busehll <proto@  2008-08-05 14:01:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-06 07:43:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-01 12:23:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-01 15:28:16 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:17:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:12:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-08-01 10:41:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:14:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-01 07:19:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-01 07:56:19 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-01 15:36:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-01 23:52:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:18:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 11:36:37 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 08:36:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 13:44:22 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 09:55:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-02 10:09:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 14:52:56 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-08-02 12:29:42 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-04 11:24:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:43:13 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 12:28:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 20:47:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-05 13:06:18 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-05 19:18:12 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-05 07:47:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-02 21:26:31 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 06:52:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 20:58:38 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-04 22:57:25 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-05 07:55:03 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 09:13:08 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-05 09:30:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-05 18:09:19 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:35:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-05 19:30:33 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-06 00:20:14 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-06 20:48:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-07 00:38:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
stremler@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-08-07 07:24:08 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-08-07 15:52:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-07 16:19:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 07:37:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 06:46:01 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-06 08:56:02 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-06 12:01:47 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:29:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:26:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-06 19:59:13 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:38:57 
Error handling for system calls (was Re: Intel: an expensive man
Lars Poulsen <lars@[EM  2008-08-06 07:36:56 
Re: Error handling for system calls (was Re: Intel: an expensive
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-06 19:55:09 
Re: Error handling for system calls (was Re: Intel: an expensive
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-06 20:59:02 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-07 00:41:22 
Re: Error handling for system calls
scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-07 18:23:14 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-07 16:33:56 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-07 18:16:08 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-07 23:04:56 
Re: Error handling for system calls
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-08 07:35:12 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-08 09:31:08 
Re: Error handling for system calls
ArarghMail808NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-08-08 16:45:19 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-08 20:34:09 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2008-08-12 11:05:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 07:02:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-02 11:21:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 06:51:30 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 11:36:18 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-03 08:59:42 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 14:00:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:23:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 12:45:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-04 09:43:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
pechter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-03 11:02:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:25:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 12:50:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-04 19:15:39 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-03 18:47:48 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-03 13:36:40 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-03 15:41:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-04 12:37:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-04 12:56:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-01 13:45:29 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-08-01 10:36:18 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-01 11:08:12 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-06 20:02:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-07 09:46:31 
Re: Error handling for system calls
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-08 21:16:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-01 10:31:07 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-07-27 14:40:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
paul hinman <paul.hinm  2008-08-12 02:19:47 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-12 06:33:13 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Charlie Gibbs"  2008-08-13 09:21:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-13 21:08:27 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Andrew Swallow <am.swa  2008-08-14 02:15:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Charlie Gibbs"  2008-08-13 22:12:59 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-14 06:55:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-14 21:10:01 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-15 06:42:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-15 07:59:45 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-16 08:29:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-08-16 10:10:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-17 06:18:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-17 08:11:26 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-17 06:14:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
ArarghMail808NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-08-17 08:40:44 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-18 20:05:00 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-18 21:13:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-13 19:55:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Charlie Gibbs"  2008-08-13 22:35:02 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-14 11:11:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-14 07:01:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Charlie Gibbs"  2008-08-14 07:33:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-15 06:37:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
"Charlie Gibbs"  2008-08-15 07:35:38 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-08-15 13:23:22 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
lynn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-15 07:47:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-07-26 18:35:19 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-07-27 12:51:29 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-07-27 14:24:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-07-28 06:43:33 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-07-28 07:43:57 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-07-27 14:42:52 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Greg Menke <gusenet@[E  2008-07-29 20:25:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Busehll <proto@  2008-07-28 12:47:12 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-07-29 07:00:43 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-07-29 15:53:45 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-07-30 06:29:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-07-27 14:56:25 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-07-28 09:47:08 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-07-28 15:44:00 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Busehll <proto@  2008-07-30 17:27:03 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-07-31 09:59:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Busehll <proto@  2008-07-31 15:38:47 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-07-31 19:24:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Walter Busehll <proto@  2008-08-01 19:33:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-07-31 23:21:48 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
t-bone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-01 12:29:16 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2008-08-07 15:23:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2008-08-12 10:48:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2008-08-01 22:10:27 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 07:19:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 11:34:02 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 08:34:27 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 13:25:35 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-02 09:48:20 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-02 14:21:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2008-08-04 20:16:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-02 11:19:37 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-02 11:24:20 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Morten Reistad <first@  2008-08-04 11:33:52 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 07:46:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-03 13:34:59 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-04 09:46:34 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-04 10:40:05 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-04 11:34:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-04 14:16:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 06:50:22 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-05 11:51:59 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 06:49:19 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-06 09:38:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-06 14:12:27 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
t-bone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-06 13:13:40 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-06 15:26:41 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-06 19:40:49 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-06 15:21:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:31:19 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-07 10:41:01 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
t-bone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-07 13:41:12 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Larry Elmore <lelmore@  2008-08-04 20:11:07 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-05 06:53:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-04 11:31:32 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ch  2008-08-04 16:37:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-04 23:29:24 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-05 07:50:30 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-05 09:25:43 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-06 06:42:08 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-05 10:24:28 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-06 08:10:23 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2008-08-06 14:33:58 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-06 08:58:03 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-06 20:07:36 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-07 07:40:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-07 18:09:17 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@[  2008-08-08 06:59:58 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-06 11:57:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2008-08-06 16:40:21 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-06 12:03:54 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Tris Orendorff <triso@  2008-08-11 23:36:50 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2008-08-06 20:12:28 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer  2008-08-07 00:36:55 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-07 17:43:11 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Charlton Wilbur <cwilb  2008-08-06 13:23:43 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2008-08-06 15:25:53 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2008-08-07 14:13:06 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-07 17:45:51 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-07 14:06:46 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2008-08-07 19:08:22 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-07 23:32:30 
Re: Intel: an expensive many-core future is ahead of us
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2008-08-09 13:46:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 17:27:16 CDT 2008.